Sen. Tom Harkin's retirement plan proposal – released Jan. 30 — has some flaws, not the least of which is that employers who offer 401(k) plans would have to change their current plans to be more like defined benefit plans if they didn't want to be forced to adopt Harkin's USA Retirement Fund, according to the National Association of Plan Advisors.
Just offering any 401(k) is not enough to keep employers from having to provide a USA Retirement Fund account. Under the legislation, an employer-provided 401(k) must include automatic enrollment and a lifetime income option. If it does not, it must change its plan to do so.
"In order for employers to be exempt from the USA Retirement Fund requirement … they would have to alter their 401(k) plan to look more like a defined benefit plan, which may be a burden on the employer. Instead we should focus on expanding retirement savings opportunities rather than trying to change the current system," said Brian Graff, executive director and CEO of the American Society of Pension Professionals & Actuaries and NAPA.
Complete your profile to continue reading and get FREE access to BenefitsPRO, part of your ALM digital membership.
Your access to unlimited BenefitsPRO content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:
- Critical BenefitsPRO information including cutting edge post-reform success strategies, access to educational webcasts and videos, resources from industry leaders, and informative Newsletters.
- Exclusive discounts on ALM, BenefitsPRO magazine and BenefitsPRO.com events
- Access to other award-winning ALM websites including ThinkAdvisor.com and Law.com
Already have an account? Sign In
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
