Employers continue to face rising health care costs, despite incremental plan design changes and carrier negotiations. At the same time, industry data consistently suggests that primary care accounts for a small fraction of total health care spending while influencing the majority of downstream costs.
The numbers make the structural disconnect visible. According to the Primary Care Collaborative, primary care accounts for just 5 to 7% of total health care spend, yet influences up to 90% of total health care costs. The 2025 Milbank Memorial Fund Scorecard puts the figure even lower, with primary care spending falling below 5% in 2022 and continuing to decline across all payers.
This raises an important benefits design question.
If primary care drives referrals, specialty utilization, imaging, and admissions, why is it not positioned as the structural foundation of employer health care strategy?
The architecture problem
Most employer-sponsored plans are built around insurance architecture first, primary care access second. Primary care is embedded within network designs rather than serving as the strategic control point for cost navigation.
That design choice has consequences.
When primary care operates as a thinly reimbursed access point within a broad network, it lacks both the time and structural leverage to meaningfully manage downstream cost. The Milbank Scorecard illustrates the reimbursement gap directly: in 2022, primary care physicians averaged $259 per visit, compared to $1,092 for gastroenterology. Physicians constrained to 13 to 16 minute appointments, a significant portion of which is consumed by EHR documentation and coding, are not positioned to coordinate care, navigate specialists, or reduce avoidable utilization. They are positioned to document and refer.
The employer bears the downstream cost of that structural limitation every plan year.
What structural alignment changes
When employers align directly with enhanced or advanced primary care models, whether through direct primary care arrangements, on-site or near-site clinics, or concierge-style membership programs, several shifts occur:
- Referral pathways can be curated rather than left to chance
- Specialist pricing transparency can improve through direct relationships
- Avoidable utilization, including ER visits, redundant imaging, and unnecessary specialist referrals, can be reduced
- Employee experience and care access often improve, supporting retention and productivity
These outcomes are not incidental. They are the result of repositioning primary care from a passive access point to an active coordination function within the benefits ecosystem.
Consider what curated referrals actually mean in practice. In a traditional network arrangement, a primary care physician who wants to refer a patient to an orthopedic specialist has little visibility into cost variation across in-network providers, little ability to steer toward higher-value options, and no structural incentive to do so. In an advanced primary care model with smaller patient panels and longer appointment times, that same physician has the relationship depth and the time to have a different kind of conversation. They can identify what the employer plan covers, where quality data supports a referral, and how to avoid a downstream cost that neither the employer nor the employee needs to absorb.
That is not a technology problem. It is not solved by adding another point solution to the benefits stack. It is a structural problem, and it has a structural answer.
The conversation worth having
The benefits industry has spent years layering solutions onto existing plan architecture, including virtual visits, centers of excellence, condition management programs, and reference-based pricing overlays. Each addresses a specific cost pressure. Few address the structural question.
The conversation should not center solely on adding virtual visits or increasing preventive screening rates. The conversation should center on structural alignment: whether the front door of health care is designed as a passive access mechanism or as an active cost management strategy.
If primary care influences the majority of health care spending, employers who ignore that leverage leave meaningful cost containment on the table. Health care affordability will not improve through incremental deductible adjustments alone. It improves when the point of entry is designed intentionally.
What this means for benefits strategy
Employers do not need to own hospitals. They do not need to become insurers. But they do need to decide whether the front door of health care is passive access or active strategy.
In practical terms, this means asking a different set of questions during plan design. Not only what is the total premium cost, but what is the total cost of care when primary care is adequately supported versus when it is not. Not only which network offers the broadest access, but which model gives the primary care relationship enough structural authority to actually manage that access. These are not hypothetical distinctions. Employers who have moved to advanced primary care arrangements consistently report lower total cost of care, higher employee satisfaction with benefits, and reduced emergency utilization. The model works when the model is the strategy, not an add-on to an existing carrier contract.
For benefits advisors, this is an opportunity to reframe the conversation with employer clients. The question is not simply which carrier offers the best network or which PBM offers the most favorable contract terms, especially as federal policy is actively reshaping how PBMs are compensated. The question is whether the plan is structured to capture the leverage that primary care already holds over downstream cost.
Because if primary care influences 90% of cost, positioning it at 5% of revenue is not just a physician problem.
It is a benefits design problem.
© Arc, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to TMSalesOperations@arc-network.com. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.