Pushing the individual health insurance mandate back one year would cause "major disruption" to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act's implementation and result in decreased coverage and increased premiums for consumers.
That's the case Linda Blumberg and John Holahan, two analysts who support the goals of PPACA, made in a commentary released by the Urban Institute.
The Internal Revenue Service already has delayed by one extra year to begin enforcing a PPACA requirement that large employers provide health benefits or else pay a penalty.
Continue Reading for Free
Register and gain access to:
- Breaking benefits news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
- Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
- Critical converage of the property casualty insurance and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, PropertyCasualty360 and ThinkAdvisor
Already have an account? Sign In Now
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
Allison Bell
Allison Bell, a senior reporter at ThinkAdvisor and BenefitsPRO, previously was an associate editor at National Underwriter Life & Health. She has a bachelor's degree in economics from Washington University in St. Louis and a master's degree in journalism from the Medill School of Journalism at Northwestern University. She can be reached through X at @Think_Allison.
