King v. Burwell, the case the Supreme Court just agreed to take up, could disrupt a crucial part of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, by blocking federal health-care subsidies in states that refuse to establish their own insurance exchanges.
Could there be a silver lining for liberals if the court decides against the government? I think so, but it's not pretty.
First, let's dispense with the idea that such a ruling would end PPACA. Sure, the outlook would be grim in states that rely on federally run exchanges, where enrollees would end up paying the full cost of their coverage. That would lead the healthy to drop out, and in turn increase costs for everyone else. It's not impossible that the individual insurance markets in those states would collapse.
Continue Reading for Free
Register and gain access to:
- Breaking benefits news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
- Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
- Critical converage of the property casualty insurance and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, PropertyCasualty360 and ThinkAdvisor
Already have an account? Sign In Now
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.