Read: FINRA chief says DOL proposal not the way forward

What can be expected, however, Roper argues, is that such legislation — expected to be introduced soon — “would give lip service to best interest without doing anything to rein in common industry practices that encourage advisors to act against their customers’ interests. That’s something [the SIFMA and FSR] proposals seem to have in common.”

SIFMA’s “uniform best-interests-of-the-customer legal standard for broker-dealers” would apply to all retail brokerage accounts, and seeks to correct the potentially conflicting fiduciary rules to be issued by DOL and the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Indeed, former SEC Commissioner Troy Paredes noted at the IRI event that he’d like to see the SEC become the agency that “has the lead” on a fiduciary rulemaking.

Lawmakers, too, will press ahead during the upcoming October appropriations process to defund DOL’s plan, Saxon said.

Both the House and Senate appropriations committees have recently passed bills to prohibit DOL from using any of its funds to finalize, implement or enforce its fiduciary rulemaking.

Rep. Ann Wagner’s bill, H.R. 2374, the Retail Investor Protection Act, which would require the DOL to wait to repropose its rule until the Securities and Exchange Commission issues its own fiduciary rulemaking, “will continue to be supported,” said Saxon, who has been critical of DOL’s redraft.

Of course, these bills face a “huge hurdle” in overcoming a presidential veto, Saxon conceded. “The White House is in support of the general direction that the DOL is going” with its fiduciary redraft.

Labor Secretary Thomas Perez noted at a recent Brookings event that the fiduciary redraft was among the top priorities for DOL in the remainder of the presidential term to “help strengthen and grow the middle class.”

Read: Brookings paper calls for radical retirement overhaul

Calling the current redraft “unworkable,” Juli McNeely, president of the National Association of Insurance and Financial Advisors, said in an email message that while NAIFA has had discussions with DOL officials about revisions to ensure the rule “does not harm middle-market investors and put undue restrictions or burdens on advisors,” NAIFA and its “industry partners have also encouraged Congress to look at the issue.”

Among what McNeely said are “several legislative options,” NAIFA hopes for legislation that would “protect the best interests of clients without imposing the burdens and confusion that the DOL rule would create.”

But Saxon didn’t hold back on airing his criticisms of DOL’s fiduciary plan at the IRI event, calling the redraft an “Erisafication” of IRAs. “Labor does not have jurisdiction of IRAs under Title 1 of ERISA,” he said.

Also, as currently drafted, DOL’s rule, with its “broad definition of fiduciary that covers all routine sales activities … is funneling everything toward” the rule’s best interest contract exemption, “at least as far as IRAs are concerned.”

But as drafted, the disclosure requirements under the BICE are “not workable,” Saxon said.

Perez stated at the Brookings event that the comments DOL is receiving on the redraft are helping to “sharpen” its thinking on how to make changes to the plan’s prohibited transaction exemptions, like the point of sale disclosure requirements under BICE.

The comment period ends July 21, and then DOL will hold hearings on the redraft the week of Aug. 10. Saxon said that while he appreciates DOL taking industry feedback, DOL should give the industry some idea “where its redraft is headed” before the August hearings.