The Supreme Court handed down its verdict on the "King v. Burwell" case on Thursday, June 25, with a 6-3 verdict in favor of taking a "vague" view of the language in the PPACA. In specific, the Supreme Court ruled that the Affordable Care Act may provide nationwide tax subsidies...
By William Atkinson|July 13, 2015 at 08:00 AM
Thank you for sharing!
Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
The Supreme Court handed down its verdict on the “King v. Burwell” case on Thursday, June 25, with a 6-3 verdict in favor of taking a “vague” view of the language in the PPACA. In specific, the Supreme Court ruled that the Affordable Care Act may provide nationwide tax subsidies designed to help certain poor and middle-class people purchase health insurance.
The law, as originally written, stated that certain individuals would be eligible for subsidies specifically in states that had their own insurance exchanges. However, it turns out, the majority of states did not set up their own exchanges, but rather deferred to the Federal exchange. And, there was nothing in the PPACA law that said these subsidies would also be available to individuals in states that were relying on the Federal exchange.
Complete your profile to continue reading and get FREE access to BenefitsPRO.com, part of your ALM digital membership.
Your access to unlimited BenefitsPRO.com content isn’t changing. Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:
Critical BenefitsPRO.com information including cutting edge post-reform success strategies, access to educational webcasts and videos, resources from industry leaders, and informative Newsletters.
Exclusive discounts on ALM, BenefitsPRO magazine and BenefitsPRO.com events.
Access to other award-winning ALM websites including ThinkAdvisor.com and Law.com