U.S. District Judge Haywood Gilliam of the Northern District of California has issued a preliminary injunction barring the Trump administration’s rule changes allowing some employers to opt out of providing contraceptive coverage under the Affordable Care Act.
Gilliam found the process leading to the changes violated the Administrative Procedure Act, a ruling that mirrored findings by U.S. District Judge Wendy Beetlestone of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, who ruled against the administration in a similar case last week.
In October, the Trump administration issued rule changes expanding the scope of the exemption for religious organizations under the Affordable Care Act’s contraceptive coverage mandate, and created a new exemption based on “moral objections.”
The states of California, Delaware, Maryland, New York and Virginia sued in the Northern District of California, and sought an injunction barring the rule changes in early November. The states argued the administration’s moves would put scores of women at risk of losing their no-cost contraceptive coverage under the ACA. The states also argued the rule changes violated the Administrative Procedure Act, which requires a notice-and-comment period prior to most federal rulemaking.
In Thursday’s ruling, Gilliam acknowledged early the federal government’s lawyers’ contention that this is a case “about religious liberty and freedom of conscience.” But, he wrote that the federal agencies’ action amounted to “a reversal of their approach to striking the proper balance between substantial governmental and societal interests.”
Gilliam ruled that the states had shown they “face potentially dire public health and fiscal consequences as a result of a process as to which they had no input.”
In a statement, California Attorney General Xavier Becerra, whose office has been leading the litigation before Gilliam, said that “a woman, not her boss and certainly not a politician, should decide what’s best for her own healthcare.”
Said Becerra: “In concert with last week’s injunction in Pennsylvania, today’s ruling amounts to a one-two punch against the Trump Administration’s unlawful overreach.”
Complete your profile to continue reading and get FREE access to BenefitsPRO, part of your ALM digital membership.
Your access to unlimited BenefitsPRO content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:
- Breaking benefits news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
- Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
- Critical converage of the property casualty insurance and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, PropertyCasualty360 and ThinkAdvisor
Already have an account? Sign In Now
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
Ross Todd
Ross Todd is the Editor/columnist for the Am Law Litigation Daily. He writes about litigation of all sorts. Previously, Ross was the Bureau Chief of The Recorder, ALM's California affiliate. Contact Ross at [email protected]. On Twitter: @Ross_Todd.
