{
  "author": {
    "name": "Joshua Fowkes",
    "webUrl": "/author/profile/joshua-fowkes/",
    "description": "",
    "imageLarge": "https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/f16d6fc2845f417ea0e93a3f2b6cd37d?s=136&d=mm&r=g",
    "estimate": 1,
    "social": [],
    "articles": [
      {
        "uri": "/2018/09/04/participants-claims-on-behalf-of-erisa-plan-not-co/",
        "title": "Participants' claims on behalf of ERISA plan not covered by arbitration clause",
        "byline": "Joshua Fowkes",
        "kicker": "Analysis",
        "prettyDate": "September 04, 2018",
        "timeToRead": "4 minute",
        "image": {
          "uri": "https://images.benefitspro.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/412/2018/04/law-judge-gavel-court-shutterstock.jpg",
          "width": "650",
          "height": "433"
        },
        "authors": [
          {
            "webUrl": "/author/profile/joshua-fowkes/",
            "name": "Joshua Fowkes"
          }
        ],
        "kickerNode": [
          {
            "uri": "/analysis/",
            "sectionName": "Analysis"
          }
        ],
        "summary": "A U.S. Court of Appeals recently upheld a ruling that a group of ERISA plan participants' claims of breach of fiduciary duty were not required to be arbitrated despite the fact that they had entered into employment agreements.",
        "body": null
      }
    ]
  }
}