The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday refused to consider two appeals in a case that accused John Hancock Life Insurance Co. of charging excessive fees on annuity insurance contracts in 401(k) plans.
By refusing to consider appeals in the case, the Supreme Court let stand an April ruling by the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia that in essence allows 401(k) participants to sue plan providers directly, instead of making them sue individual employers in many lawsuits, according to a story in the Chicago Tribune.
The 3rd Circuit decision partially reversed a lower court decision by finding that former plan beneficiaries could pursue ERISA claims without first demanding that fund trustees take action and adding the trustees as parties, the story reported. It did concur with the lower court that beneficiaries of 401(k) plans could not sue under the Investment Company Act of 1940 because they didn't invest in the funds during their lawsuit and so couldn't represent similar plaintiffs, the story reported.
Complete your profile to continue reading and get FREE access to BenefitsPRO, part of your ALM digital membership.
Your access to unlimited BenefitsPRO content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:
- Critical BenefitsPRO information including cutting edge post-reform success strategies, access to educational webcasts and videos, resources from industry leaders, and informative Newsletters.
- Exclusive discounts on ALM, BenefitsPRO magazine and BenefitsPRO.com events
- Access to other award-winning ALM websites including ThinkAdvisor.com and Law.com
Already have an account? Sign In
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
