With major portions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act just months away from taking effect, most large employers are not looking to circumvent coverage extension by reducing full-time workers' hours.
That's the conclusion of a just-released study by Towers Watson & Co. The firm surveyed 113 companies with more than 1,000 employees — 98 percent of whom said they are not planning to try to alter the status of full-time employers to go below the extended coverage trigger point of 30 hours a week.
Companies that don't offer health coverage to full-timers risk paying penalties of up to $2,000 per full-time worker who isn't covered. One strategy that has surfaced to defeat Obamacare's campaign to cover more workers is to reduce the hours of full-time employees below 30 hours a week. But large employers are apparently loathe to do so, the Towers Watson report revealed.
Continue Reading for Free
Register and gain access to:
- Breaking benefits news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
- Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
- Critical converage of the property casualty insurance and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, PropertyCasualty360 and ThinkAdvisor
Already have an account? Sign In Now
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
Dan Cook
Dan Cook is a journalist and communications consultant based in Portland, OR. During his journalism career he has been a reporter and editor for a variety of media companies, including American Lawyer Media, BusinessWeek, Newhouse Newspapers, Knight-Ridder, Time Inc., and Reuters. He specializes in health care and insurance related coverage for BenefitsPRO.
