March 25 (Bloomberg) — The Obama administration's claim that its health-care overhaul allows subsidies on health plans bought through a federal exchange met skepticism from an appeals court panel, with two judges suggesting the law as written doesn't support the payments.

The government's argument that the court should look to Congress's intent on the subsidies, rather than gaps in the statute opponents say make the payments illegal, fell flat with U.S. Circuit Judge A. Raymond Randolph.

"What you've got is language that's not malleable," he said today during a hearing in Washington. "An exchange established by the state" means "an exchange that's established by the federal government?"

Circuit Judge Thomas Griffith said determining what Congress intended was difficult because "there doesn't seem to be a lot of clear legislative history."

Complete your profile to continue reading and get FREE access to BenefitsPRO, part of your ALM digital membership.

  • Critical BenefitsPRO information including cutting edge post-reform success strategies, access to educational webcasts and videos, resources from industry leaders, and informative Newsletters.
  • Exclusive discounts on ALM, BenefitsPRO magazine and BenefitsPRO.com events
  • Access to other award-winning ALM websites including ThinkAdvisor.com and Law.com
NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.