The Supreme Court has agreed to hear a petition that could have a big impact on employers' healthcare obligations to retired union employees.
The petitioners, M&G Polymers USA, want the court to overturn a decision by the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals that said an employer must pay 100 percent of retiree healthcare costs indefinitely. M&G Polymers is claiming the Sixth Circuit's decision conflicts with the majority of court rulings on similar claims across the country.
The issue seems to be one of contractual sloppiness, willful or otherwise. The Sixth Circuit ruled that the absence of specific language in M&G's collective bargaining agreement regarding how long retirees are entitled to healthcare benefits establishes the "inference" that the retirees are vested for life. Basically, said the Sixth Circuit, if it is not contractually established that the benefits can be terminated, they can't be.
Continue Reading for Free
Register and gain access to:
- Breaking benefits news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
- Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
- Critical converage of the property casualty insurance and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, PropertyCasualty360 and ThinkAdvisor
Already have an account? Sign In Now
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.