When Benjamin Franklin first declared, "An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure," it was within the context of fighting house fires. But the adage has been applied to everything from cleaning house to health care for decades.
"As we all know, the United States health care system is by far the most expensive in the world," notes Matt Jacobson, the chief executive officer and founder of SignatureMD. "The reason our expenses are so high is because we only allocate 30 percent of our health care dollars to prevention, yet more than 70 percent of the diseases that plague this country are preventable. We have a system that's based on paying for procedure and not for prevention. If we were to allocate 25 percent more of our dollars to prevention, we would be able to eliminate many of these chronic diseases – diabetes, heart disease, hypertension and even certain forms of cancer – via diet, smoking cessation and exercise. It would eliminate more than 25 percent of health care expenditures."
However, now that the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act has mandated that insurance companies cover preventive care procedures, some health care experts wonder whether an ounce of prevention really is worth a pound of cure in today's economy. As is par for the course in health care, much of the debate centers on how to define prevention – and how to delineate prevention from treatment, which isn't always easy.
Recommended For You
"There are three types of prevention that have been discussed for 250 to 300 years: primary, secondary and tertiary preventions," explains Dr. David Nace, vice president of clinical development and medical director at McKesson. "Primary prevention means avoiding an occurrence in a person or a population. For example, eating well helps prevent all the complications that come from not eating well – that concept of wellness falls into this category of avoiding occurrence and primary prevention.
"Secondary prevention is identifying people who have a disease but don't show symptoms yet," he continues. "One great example of this that's common in the United States is cardiovascular disease; you can detect that before a patient ever shows symptoms by measuring blood pressure. Secondary prevention is early diagnosis and treatment to prevent progress of symptoms or ameliorate the course of disease.
"Tertiary prevention is preventing the progression of the disease. For example, if a patient with congestive heart failure has already had a heart attack, then you have to treat not only the immediate episode but also consider what you can do to prevent another one.
"Each of these categories has inherent cost issues," Nace notes, "because offering a preventive care program for everybody is different than offering it for a targeted group. And prevention and treatment overlap. If you're doing secondary prevention, measuring blood pressure in a patient who has cardiovascular disease and you don't know it – are you treating the disease, or are you preventing it?"
Although carriers are on the hook for covering preventive care in any plans they offer the public, it's clear there might be some disagreement about what constitutes prevention and what constitutes treatment. Furthermore, many experts note that preventive care is only successful when a patient is invested in his or her health – and that's not necessarily a given.
"A lot of payers and providers assume that when somebody's unhealthy, they want to get better," says Paul Schrimpf, an associate partner at Prophet. "Oddly enough, that's not always the case. Some people are less healthy than others: They smoke, they drink, they don't exercise, they figure everybody's going to die someday and they just don't care. People who are unhealthy and want to get better – those are the people who will be impacted by preventive care programs. It's not going to be healthy people who stay healthy or unhealthy people who don't care."
And sometimes, prevention simply doesn't work as hoped.
"We have a myth in the United States, and the myth is that illness is optional and that everything can be prevented," says Alan Spiro, MD, chief medical officer and chief health assistant at Accolade. "People get sick; it's part of the human condition. There are things you can do to stay healthier, and that fits into prevention. But there's a distinction between activities you can do on your own to decrease your risk of illness – diet, exercise, those types of wellness activities – and visiting a doctor for a routine screening."
"Not all preventive care is created equal," Schrimpf says.
There are, however, some measures that experts generally agree are beneficial for your health – and that can help save money for carriers in the long run.
"I think it's a very good idea from a preventive point of view to have a primary care physician and to see that doctor in some kind of regular way, making sure that there's some continuity and the doctor has a chance to get to know you," Spiro notes.
"Many of the activities that are really effective in terms of wellness don't have anything to do with medical costs," Nace says. "And many of these prevention activities are timespan-related in terms of cost-effectiveness for the health plan."
In other words, health plans will reap the most benefit from many prevention activities over an extended period of time – and there's no guarantee that the insured will stay enrolled with the health plan that generated the prevention program.
"When it comes to preventive care and treatment options, what I think is a better question than 'is it cost-effective?' is, 'Is it of good value?'" Nace continues. "Are you getting a significant benefit for the money that you're spending? The treatment in question might be more expensive than what's already available, but the greater benefit that it offers is worth that extra money. This new medicine for hepatitis: It obviously is much more expensive than anything else out there today, but it cures hepatitis. And nothing else has ever cured hepatitis, only managed it. So the question really becomes: Is the benefit you're gaining from a new drug that now can do more to treat your condition worth that extra money?"
Although preventive care and wellness might be the big buzzwords in the industry, experts also caution against jumping on-board with a program that doesn't address specifics.
"Beware of buzzwords, and especially buzzwords that have price-tags attached to them," says Spiro. "When someone says 'wellness' or 'prevention' to you and says they can help you with that for only so many dollars per employee per month, then immediately, your next questions have to be, 'Exactly what do you do, and how many of my employees will take part in and benefit from that – and how will they benefit?' There have to be more questions."
And ultimately, whether preventive care is successful also will depend on patient investment. Jacobson's SignatureMD concierge model is one example.
"The reason why concierge and other personalized care models work is because the patient is making a monetary investment in his or her health," he explains. "When the patient is allocating $1,800 a year toward a preventive health program, they're making a commitment with their wallet saying that they'll visit the doctor regularly, solicit a treatment plan and adhere to it."
"The best thing an employer can do is to say, 'What can I do to engage the workforce?'" Nace says. "Now that we've moved toward value-based reimbursement where we're holding physicians and organizations responsible for how well they're treating chronic illness, the doctor pushback is that they can't influence what patients do. So the next step is to develop ways to incent patients to get skin in the game."
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.