A federal judge ruled for the plaintiff and declared MassMutual to be a functional fiduciary under ERISA. Her reasoning was that MassMutual had the ability to set its own compensation without consulting with the plan sponsor, effectively giving MassMutual discretionary authority over plan's assets. Even though MassMutual did not admit liability in the settlement, the implications are large for other plan providers who may be in similar circumstances.

In the settlement, MassMutual will pay out over $9 million in cash compensation, give a 60-day window for any planned fund changes, and, most importantly, clearly disclose fees and expense ratios in plan funds as well as any revenue sharing payments it receives.

The ruling and settlement appear to open the door to further legal action by plan sponsors in a similar arrangement with other providers.  While not all providers with revenue sharing may be deemed fiduciaries, the risk of potential liability may cause many to evaluate their fee disclosure procedures and make pre-emptive changes. Look for other plan providers to open up and disclose revenue sharing arrangements in order to avoid potential liability.

The case is also instructive in continuing the trend toward broader application of the term fiduciary with regard to retirement plans, especially small business 401(k) plans with typically higher and often hidden fees. 

With federal regulators evaluating fiduciary standards, look for more and more providers to fall under the functional fiduciary standard. The tougher and more expansive the standard, the more robust will be fee disclosures in everyday practice.

With all apologies to the great architect Louis Sullivan, "Frugal ever follows function."