The U.S. Houses move toward a temporary patch that would expire Dec. 31 shows lawmakers desire to wrap up the congressional session as soon as possible and minimize disruption to the start of the tax-filing season in January.
By Richard Rubin, James Rowley|December 02, 2014 at 05:19 AM|Originally published on Benefitspro.Com
Thank you for sharing!
Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Dec. 2 (Bloomberg) — House Republicans are moving toward a vote this week on legislation to revive dozens of lapsed U.S. tax breaks and extend them only through the end of this year. The decision reflects Republicans’ calculation that a $400 billion-plus bipartisan proposal that collapsed last week probably can’t be resurrected and would face an uncertain fate in the House even if it could. That tentative agreement would have made permanent some significant business tax breaks, including the research-and-development tax credit and expanded capital write-offs for small businesses. The U.S. House’s move toward a temporary patch that would expire Dec. 31 shows lawmakers’ desire to wrap up the congressional session as soon as possible and minimize disruption to the start of the tax-filing season in January. “It’s either this or nothing,” said Republican Rep. Pat Tiberi of Ohio, a senior member of the House Ways and Means Committee. The measure, H.R. 5771, is expected to reach the House floor tomorrow. It would cost the government $44.7 billion in forgone revenue over a decade, according to the Joint Committee on Taxation. Rep. Sander Levin of Michigan, the top Democrat on the House Ways and Means Committee, backed the package last night, signaling that the bill may have a broad bipartisan vote in the House. Top Senate Democrats haven’t taken a position. Camp’s measure
The bill introduced yesterday by House Ways and Means Chairman Dave Camp, a Michigan Republican, makes almost no policy changes to the breaks and extends almost all of those that lapsed at the end of last year.
Help clients solve business problems with carve-out supplemental expense reimbursed insurance. What was once only referred to as “executive medical reimbursement” is still possible today, as long as it is structured correctly.