For all the talk about investment options as they pertain to 401(k) plans, beyond addressing the basics there's very little differentiation in the long-term impact of the choices. What does make a difference? According to a May 2014 report from the Putnam Institute, “…regardless of strategy, fund selection generated roughly the same amount of wealth.”
For years, advisers, plan sponsors and retirement savers have been led to believe in the preeminent importance of investment choices. Companies formed investment committees to listen to investment consultants as frequently as once a quarter. This was considered the “prudent” thing to do.
But was it? The Putnam Institute report is just one of the latest research papers belittling this idea. There's no practical difference between utilizing the wide variety of long-term investment options available. Is it really “prudent” to emphasize investment due diligence at the expense of other factors? Furthermore, to what extent is there a breach of fiduciary duty if those other factors have been shown to have a greater impact on achieving retirement success?
Continue Reading for Free
Register and gain access to:
- Breaking benefits news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
- Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
- Critical converage of the property casualty insurance and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, PropertyCasualty360 and ThinkAdvisor
Already have an account? Sign In Now
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.