Explicit fees charged for managed accounts are pretty much resistant to compression, according to new research from consultant Cerulli Associates. In addition, there's still disagreement within the industry about whether consumers actually understand the fees they pay.

With the exception of unified managed accounts, Cerulli found that explicit fees charged for managed accounts — sub-advisory separate accounts, mutual fund accounts, rep-as-portfolio-manager, and rep-as-advisor accounts — haven't changed much between 2008 and 2014, with only a 3-to-6-basis-point variation. Under the surface, however, Cerulli said, "the way in which the total fee is carved up and shared among the advisor, sponsor, and money manager has not."

UMAs are another matter, however, with direct-to-consumer firms entering the market and driving down the cost of such accounts by 20 basis points. In addition, direct-to-consumer marketing keeps consumers very aware of costs, which has exerted substantial downward pressure on prices.

Continue Reading for Free

Register and gain access to:

  • Breaking benefits news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
  • Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
  • Critical converage of the property casualty insurance and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, PropertyCasualty360 and ThinkAdvisor
NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.