There's a fee war brewing, only it's not the kind you might expect.
It's not about the dollars or the basis points or even the source. No sooner had the White House declared war on conflicts-of-interest (i.e., where advisors get their fee from) than nefarious elements within our brotherhood sought to immediately change the terms of the debate to how advisor fees are calculated. Can't we nip this one in the bud before we convince ourselves our services have no economic value?
Asset-based fees: This represents the traditional RIA compensation metric. It best aligns the interests of the client with the interests of the adviser. If the adviser selects winning investments, client assets rise and so does the adviser's compensation. If the adviser selects losing investments, clients assets fall and so does the adviser's compensation. You can't get any simpler or fairer than that. Long the preferred form of fees basis for the fiduciary, it removes all conflicts of interest when it comes to selecting investments. (Along these lines, asset-based fee structures have recently evoked controversy as some advisers have sought to charge different rates for different asset classes, presenting a classic conflict-of-interest.)
Continue Reading for Free
Register and gain access to:
- Breaking benefits news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
- Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
- Critical converage of the property casualty insurance and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, PropertyCasualty360 and ThinkAdvisor
Already have an account? Sign In Now
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.