“Can do!” has pretty much been the mantra of the Obama administration’s attitude toward finding ways to offer health insurance to Americans. But when it comes to pregnant moms, suddenly the word was: “No can do!”
That's a simplification of the latest policy pronouncement from the Department of Health and Human Services.
In the string of special efforts to get folks to sign up for affordable coverage, the administration invented the extended enrollment period for uninsured who just might tumble to the need for coverage when they did their taxes.
Then pregnant women were brought into the discussion.
U.S. Sen. Patty Murphy (D-Wash.) went to bat for pregnant moms without health insurance by recommending an extended enrollment period just for them. This initiative attracted the support of many Democrats, and ignited a campaign to convince HHS Secretary Sylvia Burwell to go ahead and roll out a special extension for pregnant women.
But Burwell, in a response to a letter Murphy, with 36 other signatures, sent in March, this week said HHS does not have “the legal authority to establish pregnancy as an exceptional circumstance” to create a special enrollment period. Burwell cited legal precedent and guidance from large insurers as reasons.
Burwell said pregnant women could enroll in Medicaid and the Children’s Health Insurance Program.
“Women with low and moderate incomes can enroll in these programs at any time if they qualify,” Burwell wrote. “And, like all other qualified individuals, pregnant women can enroll in the Marketplace during the annual open enrollment period.”
Many were disappointed in the response.
“It is absolutely critical that all pregnant women have access to health care coverage, so I am disappointed by today’s announcement,” Murray said in a statement. “I will continue looking for ways to get this done so that more women can get covered and get the affordable, high quality care they need for themselves and their young children.”
Jen Mishory, executive director at Young Invincibles, a millennial advocacy group, also said she was disappointed in the news.
"We’re gravely disappointed the Administration is leaving pregnant women vulnerable during a life-changing event and won’t allow an opportunity to gain access to much-needed coverage outside of open enrollment,” she said in a statement. “The Administration has the authority to create special enrollment periods in cases like these, but is instead ignoring the calls to protect women's health of nearly 100 members of Congress, over 100,000 consumers, and dozens of organizations to do so. The Administration has named many extraordinary circumstances qualifying life events for special enrollment, and there’s no reason — legal or otherwise — they cannot do so here.”
Complete your profile to continue reading and get FREE access to BenefitsPRO, part of your ALM digital membership.
Your access to unlimited BenefitsPRO content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:
- Breaking benefits news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
- Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
- Critical converage of the property casualty insurance and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, PropertyCasualty360 and ThinkAdvisor
Already have an account? Sign In Now
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
Dan Cook
Dan Cook is a journalist and communications consultant based in Portland, OR. During his journalism career he has been a reporter and editor for a variety of media companies, including American Lawyer Media, BusinessWeek, Newhouse Newspapers, Knight-Ridder, Time Inc., and Reuters. He specializes in health care and insurance related coverage for BenefitsPRO.
