Opponents of the Department of Labor’s redraft of its rule toamend the definition of fiduciary for retirementadvice wasted no time filing comment letters as well as studieschallenging numerous aspects of the plan.
|With the comment period on the redraft expiring Tuesday, theSecurities Industry and Financial MarketsAssociation and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce submittedseveral iterations of their objections to the redraft.
|Read: Few advisors neutral on fiduciaryrule
|The Senate Committee of Health Education Labor and Pensionsplans to hold a hearing on DOL’s plan Tuesday as well.
|SIFMA submitted eight comment letters on DOL’s proposed rule to redefinefiduciary under the Employee Retirement IncomeSecurity Act that not only address the fiduciary rule itself butalso the controversial best interest contract exemption and otherprohibited transaction exemptions. The Wall Street trade group alsosubmitted two studies highlighting the plan’s operational andeconomic challenges.
|The U.S. Chamber of Commerce submitted four separate commentletters on DOL’s plan as well as its related prohibited transactionexemptions along with an economic impact analysis.
|As of Monday, DOL had received 300 comment letters regarding its redraft as well aspetitions.
|Ken Bentsen, SIFMA’s president and CEO, reiterated on a callwith reporters SIFMA’s position that the securities regulators —the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Financial IndustryRegulatory Authority — should lead a best interest standardrulemaking.
|“I’m concerned we’ll end up with multiple standards that willconfuse clients,” Bentsen said. “We believe DOL is the wrongregulator to be in the lead here, and the rule as writtencompletely misses the mark.”
|On a separate call held by the Chamber of Commerce, BradCampbell, former head of DOL’s Employee Benefits SecurityAdministration, who’s now a lawyer with Drinker Biddle & Reathin Washington, said that while DOL intends its fiduciary rule tohelp IRA owners get better advice, “it undercuts all of thoseefforts; it will go the other direction and make it more difficultfor IRA owners and small businesses to get advice.”
|Calling DOL’s plan the “most sweeping” rule since ERISA,Campbell said, the redraft “is technically flawed,”adding that “the way it has been proposed it cannot work inpractice; it conflicts with other securities regulation.”
|SIFMA’s Bentsen noted that while it was “premature” to saywhether SIFMA would challenge DOL’s rule in court, SIFMA has askedDOL in its comment to extend its “extremely aggressive” 60-dayimplementation and eight-month “applicability” timeline. Theoriginal ERISA rule’s 36-month implementation deadline, Bentsensaid, is what SIFMA has requested “if [DOL] goes to a finalrule.”
|The Chamber wants a "negotiated rulemaking," said Alice Joe,managing director of the Chamber's Center for Capital MarketsCompetitiveness.
|"There will still be more questions if there's a final rule,"added Aliya Wong, executive director of Chamber's retirementpolicy.
|--- Related reading at ThinkAdvisor:
Complete your profile to continue reading and get FREE access to BenefitsPRO, part of your ALM digital membership.
Your access to unlimited BenefitsPRO content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:
- Critical BenefitsPRO information including cutting edge post-reform success strategies, access to educational webcasts and videos, resources from industry leaders, and informative Newsletters.
- Exclusive discounts on ALM, BenefitsPRO magazine and BenefitsPRO.com events
- Access to other award-winning ALM websites including ThinkAdvisor.com and Law.com
Already have an account? Sign In
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.