By banning smoking at work and inrestaurants and bars, the U.S. government has apparently made adent in teen smoking.

|

That’s the word from a long-term study of trends among youngsmokers from the Center for Tobacco Control Research and Educationof the University of California, San Francisco.

|

Researchers were able to frame the effect in terms the tobacco industry can wellunderstand: They said the dampening impact was the same as anadditional per-pack cigarette tax of $1.57.

|

Reporting on the study’s results, Reuters said that there weretwo major conclusions:

|

1) Smoke-free workplaceregulations decreased the odds of teens taking upsmoking by a whopping 30 percent;

|

2) Smoke-free bars had little to no measurable effect onwhen teens began to smoke, although such laws did tend to reduceyouth smoking in general.

|

Thus was the power of the workplace isolated and heralded by theresearchers.

|

“When you pass workplace laws it sends a strong message thatsmoking is out,” said the study’s senior author, Stanton Glantz.“Teenagers are looking to adults, and see adults rejectingsmoking.”

|

Glantz told Reuters that, although raising taxes on cigarettesclearly cuts down on the number of young people who take upsmoking, the study proved that such factors as smoke-freeworkplaces can have a powerful effect as well.

Complete your profile to continue reading and get FREE access to BenefitsPRO, part of your ALM digital membership.

  • Critical BenefitsPRO information including cutting edge post-reform success strategies, access to educational webcasts and videos, resources from industry leaders, and informative Newsletters.
  • Exclusive discounts on ALM, BenefitsPRO magazine and BenefitsPRO.com events
  • Access to other award-winning ALM websites including ThinkAdvisor.com and Law.com
NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.