Just before any flight takes off, your friendly steward/stewardess demonstrates how to use the oxygen mask “in the unlikely event of cabin depressurization.” What's the first thing you're told? “Apply the mask to yourself before you give it to a child or anyone else.” Are they advocating a selfish act? No. They realize your child is more likely to survive if you're conscious and the child is unconscious, rather than the other way around.
The same methodology can be applied to the retirement savings versus paying for college scenario. At some point, most parents will face this dilemma. (It's not an either/or proposition, but I'll be treating it that way for the purposes of this article.) Many financial professionals insist parents take care of themselves first before they tend to the children. They want parents to save for retirement before they spend a penny on their kids' education.
Is this smart?
Continue Reading for Free
Register and gain access to:
- Breaking benefits news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
- Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
- Critical converage of the property casualty insurance and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, PropertyCasualty360 and ThinkAdvisor
Already have an account? Sign In Now
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.