gavel The Checksmart lawsuit garnered attention because it involved a more modestly sized retirement plan, with less than 2,000 participants and roughly $25 million in assets. (Photo: Shutterstock)

In July 2016, Enrique Bernaola filed a putative class-action lawsuit against his employer, Checksmart Financial, LLC., and others, under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA). Mr. Bernaola, who participated in Checksmart’s retirement plan for its employees, sued the defendants, alleging that they violated their fiduciary duties under ERISA by failing to provide the appropriate amount of passively managed mutual funds as investment options under the plan, resulting in excessively high investment fees being charged to the plan and its participants.

Related: Quiz: How well do you know ERISA rules?

Complete your profile to continue reading and get FREE access to, part of your ALM digital membership.

Your access to unlimited content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:

  • Critical information including cutting edge post-reform success strategies, access to educational webcasts and videos, resources from industry leaders, and informative Newsletters.
  • Exclusive discounts on ALM, BenefitsPRO magazine and events.
  • Access to other award-winning ALM websites including and

Already have an account?


© 2023 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.



Join BenefitsPRO

Don’t miss crucial news and insights you need to navigate the shifting employee benefits industry. Join now!

  • Unlimited access to - your roadmap to thriving in a disrupted environment
  • Access to other award-winning ALM websites including and
  • Exclusive discounts on and ALM events.

Already have an account? Sign In Now
Join BenefitsPRO

Copyright © 2023 ALM Global, LLC. All Rights Reserved.