Evidence-based vendors should have results to share from one or more clinical trials conducted by medical and research professionals trained in human subjects research. (Photo: Shutterstock)

When it comes to choosing a targeted solution for a specific clinical condition, the most challenging task can be differentiating between evidence-based and experimental offerings.

Vendors often use buzzwords like “clinically proven” and misleading statistics to sound compelling, but unpublished data, such as marketing claims, company white papers and testimonials are not the same as evidence-based medicine.

How pervasive is this issue? Out of 318,000 mobile health apps, a 2017 industry report found only 571 published studies testing apps in trials. Couple this with systematic reviews published in 2011 and 2014 that found companies receiving no return on investment for worksite health promotion programs, and the picture is clear: the workplace wellness industry has a reputation for under-delivering on its promises.

Continue Reading for Free

Register and gain access to:

  • Breaking benefits news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
  • Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
  • Critical converage of the property casualty insurance and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, PropertyCasualty360 and ThinkAdvisor
NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.