Because ofSocial Security's progressive benefit formula, the averagetwo-earner couple has a Social Security replacement rate that isnot only lower than the one-earner couple but also that for singlewomen. (Photo: Shutterstock)
Because of the way Social Security was designed—and when—womenthe most at risk for coming up short of funds in retirement areactually those in two-earner married couples.
This counter-intuitive finding is the conclusion of a brief from the Center forRetirement Research at Boston College, which sought to discover howa woman's changing marital history affects her retirementincome.
Continue Reading for Free
Register and gain access to:
- Breaking benefits news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
- Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
- Critical converage of the property casualty insurance and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, PropertyCasualty360 and ThinkAdvisor
Already have an account? Sign In Now
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
Marlene Satter
Marlene Y. Satter has worked in and written about the financial industry for decades.
