Never have I been proven wrong so quickly.
On January 7th, the EEOC announced their proposed rules for clinically based wellness programs. The rules, as directed by the 2017 decision in AARP v. EEOC, reduce employee participation in wellness programs by capping allowable incentives at "de minimis."(Examples of de minimis incentives would be t-shirts and water bottles.)
Yet most employers, especially larger ones, find that employees participate in these programs only if they are highly incentivized, threatened with large fines for non-participation, or forced to make a choice between a more and less attractive health benefit. None of these will be allowed, no matter where the de minimis line is drawn.
Complete your profile to continue reading and get FREE access to BenefitsPRO, part of your ALM digital membership.
Your access to unlimited BenefitsPRO content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:
- Breaking benefits news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
- Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
- Critical converage of the property casualty insurance and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, PropertyCasualty360 and ThinkAdvisor
Already have an account? Sign In Now
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
