gavel resting on an array of currency The ordinance allows employers to comply with the rules by making payments through the ERISA health benefit plans or by paying additional compensation to workers. (Photo: Shutterstock)

State or federal? That is a debate playing out in the streets as people protest a leaked ruling from the United States Supreme Court. But not all such jurisdictional debates are that contentious.

The Supreme Court is being asked to look at a disagreement now playing out between federal appellate courts. The issue: What takes precedent on pay-to-play laws that require employers to make minimum monthly health care payments; state laws or the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)?

Complete your profile to continue reading and get FREE access to, part of your ALM digital membership.

Your access to unlimited content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:

  • Critical information including cutting edge post-reform success strategies, access to educational webcasts and videos, resources from industry leaders, and informative Newsletters.
  • Exclusive discounts on ALM, BenefitsPRO magazine and events.
  • Access to other award-winning ALM websites including and

Already have an account?



Join BenefitsPRO

Don’t miss crucial news and insights you need to navigate the shifting employee benefits industry. Join now!

  • Unlimited access to - your roadmap to thriving in a disrupted environment
  • Access to other award-winning ALM websites including and
  • Exclusive discounts on and ALM events.

Already have an account? Sign In Now
Join BenefitsPRO

Copyright © 2023 ALM Global, LLC. All Rights Reserved.