Birth Control (Photo: Shutterstock)

The U.S. Supreme Court’s Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health decision last summer and subsequent action by several states has led to questions about contraceptive options and access.

“Some feel that the right to contraception is at stake in light of Justice Thomas’s concurrence in Dobbs, suggesting that the court revisit Griswold, which granted the right to contraception,” says Alina Salganicoff, Ph.D., senior vice president and director of women’s health policy for KFF. “In addition, there are concerns about the implications of abortion bans that grant personhood at the moment of fertilization, not to mention broad-scale misinformation about the mechanism of action of many commonly used contraceptives.

Complete your profile to continue reading and get FREE access to, part of your ALM digital membership.

Your access to unlimited content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:

  • Critical information including cutting edge post-reform success strategies, access to educational webcasts and videos, resources from industry leaders, and informative Newsletters.
  • Exclusive discounts on ALM, BenefitsPRO magazine and events.
  • Access to other award-winning ALM websites including and

Already have an account?


Join BenefitsPRO

Don’t miss crucial news and insights you need to navigate the shifting employee benefits industry. Join now!

  • Unlimited access to - your roadmap to thriving in a disrupted environment
  • Access to other award-winning ALM websites including and
  • Exclusive discounts on and ALM events.

Already have an account? Sign In Now
Join BenefitsPRO

Copyright © 2023 ALM Global, LLC. All Rights Reserved.