With the overwhelming majority of disputes resolved using settlement agreements, they have a unique and prominent place in the litigation setting. They are generally anti-climactic. The sparring of litigation is over, and the parties have decided to move on from their dispute. Yet, I'm seeing a new era in settlement agreements in the employee benefits context, and it's one I find unsettling.
Earlier in my legal career, if a benefit plan wanted to keep the terms of a settlement confidential, that request came with a cost – and rightly so. Each party understood the financial value of non-disclosure, and it was agreed that their extra compensation was the correct approach to cover this new and continuing obligation. It seems almost quaint to reflect on that time when it was chiefly the dollar amount of the settlement that was confidential. For the most part, the fear that the party paying the settlement would open itself up to payment demands by other plan members with similar claims should the amount be disclosed was acknowledged and understood.
Complete your profile to continue reading and get FREE access to BenefitsPRO, part of your ALM digital membership.
Your access to unlimited BenefitsPRO content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:
- Critical BenefitsPRO information including cutting edge post-reform success strategies, access to educational webcasts and videos, resources from industry leaders, and informative Newsletters.
- Exclusive discounts on ALM, BenefitsPRO magazine and BenefitsPRO.com events
- Access to other award-winning ALM websites including ThinkAdvisor.com and Law.com
Already have an account? Sign In
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
