The Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America has joined two other associations in a federal lawsuit challenging the price-setting provisions of the Inflation Reduction Act.

PhRMA, along with the Global Colon Cancer Association and the National Infusion Center Association, assert that the IRA is unconstitutional, including what the groups call an excise tax threat for noncompliance to agree to prices set by the federal government. The tax can reach as high as 1,900% of a manufacturer's total U.S. revenues for a drug, they said. "It is no negotiation at all," the lawsuit said. "It is a government mandate disguised as negotiation. And it is unconstitutional, on several grounds."

The PhRMA lawsuit is the fourth challenge to price-setting provisions of the Inflation Reduction Act that instruct the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services overseeing Medicare to start negotiating prices for a handful of high cost drugs each year starting in 2026. Previous lawsuits have been filed by Merck, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and Bristol Myers Squibb.

Complete your profile to continue reading and get FREE access to BenefitsPRO, part of your ALM digital membership.

Your access to unlimited BenefitsPRO content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:

  • Breaking benefits news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
  • Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
  • Critical converage of the property casualty insurance and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, PropertyCasualty360 and ThinkAdvisor
NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.