Compliance

One question is whether a law giving CMS and EBSA their teeth back would be constitutional.

"The act requires employers to provide accommodations, unless it will result in an 'undue hardship' for the company," says Chris Williams, employment practices liability product manager at Travelers.

Institute economists contend that many applicants are lying about their income to maximize subsidies.

As plan sponsors continue to evaluate the optional provisions of SECURE 2.0, many have selected which ones best align with their participants, according to Fidelity Investments.

The future of noncompetes is uncertain, but the current trend is decidedly toward limiting their application.

How will the Supreme Court decision to overturn a 40-year-old precedent affect employers and their benefits?