The U.S. Supreme Court ruled benefit plan administrators who are responsible for deciding an employee's eligibility and whether or not to pay claims have a potential conflict of interest, according to the Financial Times. The paper reports, "The justices decided that courts reviewing cases where a claimant was denied disability benefits are entitled to take into account the potential conflict engendered by this kind of dual rule."
|Justice Stephen Breyer said ERISA demanded insurers act in plan participants' and beneficiaries' best interests when processing claims, although he warned against adopting "a rule that could bring about near universal de novo review of most Erisa plan claims denials."
|In a separate ruling, the court found a 1967 Act which made employers responsible for proving employment decisions are not based on age.
Complete your profile to continue reading and get FREE access to BenefitsPRO, part of your ALM digital membership.
Your access to unlimited BenefitsPRO content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:
- Critical BenefitsPRO information including cutting edge post-reform success strategies, access to educational webcasts and videos, resources from industry leaders, and informative Newsletters.
- Exclusive discounts on ALM, BenefitsPRO magazine and BenefitsPRO.com events
- Access to other award-winning ALM websites including ThinkAdvisor.com and Law.com
Already have an account? Sign In
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
