If I've learned anything from the past week (or ever), it's to never anticipate effectual planning from Washington. Something always gets caught under the wagon wheel.
Take, for example, when a recent Wall Street Journal article examined a potentially flawed design in the Pension Protection Act of 2006. WSJ reports the law's encouragement of automatic enrollment in 401(k) plans undermined savings rates because people put away less money than if they were left to enroll voluntarily.
The Employee Benefit Research Institute backed this up, but I was disappointed the story didn't cover both sides. Yes, automatic enrollment can result in lower deferral rates, but that doesn't necessarily mean the law specifically inhibits savings, or that automatic enrollment is sabotaging retirement. If you ask EBRI, they'll tell you auto-enrollment is one of the best plan features for the lowest-income 401(k) participants. And a new Fidelity survey shows 20 percent of workers wouldn't be saving at all if they didn't have a retirement plan at the office.
Continue Reading for Free
Register and gain access to:
- Breaking benefits news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
- Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
- Critical converage of the property casualty insurance and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, PropertyCasualty360 and ThinkAdvisor
Already have an account? Sign In Now
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.