Employers often report being frustrated when they offer what they believe to be an innovative health insurance option to employees and few people select it during the enrollment period. This experience makes employers less likely to offer such options, even though they are convinced that their workers would be healthier and costs over time lower if employees took advantage of the opportunity.

One solution: force employees to opt out, rather than opt in, to such programs. But how well does that work?

Researchers at UCLA can offer some insight into that. The short answer: Yes, opt out works very well. But how did they determine this?

Complete your profile to continue reading and get FREE access to BenefitsPRO, part of your ALM digital membership.

  • Critical BenefitsPRO information including cutting edge post-reform success strategies, access to educational webcasts and videos, resources from industry leaders, and informative Newsletters.
  • Exclusive discounts on ALM, BenefitsPRO magazine and BenefitsPRO.com events
  • Access to other award-winning ALM websites including ThinkAdvisor.com and Law.com
NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

Dan Cook

Dan Cook is a journalist and communications consultant based in Portland, OR. During his journalism career he has been a reporter and editor for a variety of media companies, including American Lawyer Media, BusinessWeek, Newhouse Newspapers, Knight-Ridder, Time Inc., and Reuters. He specializes in health care and insurance related coverage for BenefitsPRO.