As the Multiemployer Pension Reform Act of 2014 comes closer to reality for tens of thousands of retirees, new legislation is emerging from both sides of the political aisle that would give union members the final say in authorizing clawbacks in their pensions.

Passed as a rider to the omnibus spending bill in the eleventh hour of the last Congressional session, the controversial law gives trustees to multiemployer plans in “critical and declining status,” which means they are expected to be insolvent in the next 15 years, power to cut promised pension payments of active and retired participants.

Those reductions have to be approved by the Treasury Department, and can be made only after sponsors and trustees have taken all reasonable measures apart from reducing benefits, like increasing sponsor and participant contributions, to avoid insolvency.

The law says the benefit reductions must be approved by vote by affected union members.

If they vote the benefit reductions down, Treasury can override the vote, if the plan is deemed systemically important to the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp.’s multiemployer pension program.

The latest legislation introduced in the House of Representatives, which is a companion law to a version introduced in the Senate by Rob Portman, R-Ohio, would not allow Treasury to override union members.

Rep. David Joyce R-Ohio and Tim Ryan D-Ohio co-sponsored the House version.

Last April, trustees of the financially strapped Teamsters Central States multiemployer plan told members they would be availing themselves of the new measures passed in MPRA.

The Central States plan covers the retirement benefits of about 410,000 active and retired workers. It reportedly has about $18 billion in assets, pays $2.8 billion in annual benefits, and only takes in about $700 million a year in contributions.

More aggressive legislation has been introduced by Presidential candidate Bernie Sanders, I-Vermont, which would repeal all of MPRA.

Rep. Marcy Kaptur, D-Ohio, also sponsored the Keep Our Pension Promises Act of 2015.

That both Republican and Democrat lawmakers are taking the lead in reforming or repealing MPRA may be expected, given Ohio’s prominence as a battleground state in national elections.

Continue Reading for Free

Register and gain access to:

  • Breaking benefits news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
  • Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
  • Critical converage of the property casualty insurance and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, PropertyCasualty360 and ThinkAdvisor
NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

Nick Thornton

Nick Thornton is a financial writer covering retirement and health care issues for BenefitsPRO and ALM Media. He greatly enjoys learning from the vast minds in the legal, academic, advisory and money management communities when covering the retirement space. He's also written on international marketing trends, financial institution risk management, defense and energy issues, the restaurant industry in New York City, surfing, cigars, rum, travel, and fishing. When not writing, he's pushing into some land or water.