A research brief from the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College finds that a measure intended to help older workers find work—especially in smaller firms—wasn’t much help.
Limiting the premiums insurers could charge for health insurance on workers in smaller firms, a provision put forth by most states during the 1990s, was intended to benefit both workers and firms—the former, in being able to find employment and at better pay; the latter, in not being hit with more expensive health insurance premiums across the board for their employees.
Continue Reading for Free
Register and gain access to:
- Breaking benefits news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
- Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
- Critical converage of the property casualty insurance and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, PropertyCasualty360 and ThinkAdvisor
Already have an account? Sign In Now
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
