When government lawyers defended the measures as a bid to bolster the ACA, a judge questioned whether that position squared with President Donald Trump's stated intent to do away with his predecessor's signature legislative achievement. (Photo: Shutterstock)
Trump administration lawyers drew a skeptical response from a federal judge over a government initiative to let small businesses and individuals band together to create group health plans that offer cheaper coverage than Obamacare but without some of its protections.
During a hearing in Washington Thursday, a dozen Democratic state attorneys general asked U.S. District Judge John Bates to strike down U.S. Labor Department rules enabling association health plans. So-called AHPs would leave people who have health insurance with lesser or no coverage while increasing the need to police newly created group plans for fraud, boosting costs for states, said Matthew Grieco, the attorney representing the plaintiffs.
Related: New ACA plans moving forward
Continue Reading for Free
Register and gain access to:
- Breaking benefits news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
- Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
- Critical converage of the property casualty insurance and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, PropertyCasualty360 and ThinkAdvisor
Already have an account? Sign In Now
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.