There is no question that subrogation and reimbursement cases can sometimes create tension between employees and employers, but the plan sponsor likely has a fiduciary duty to engage in activities that will ensure prudent management of plan assets, and ultimately, the financial viability of the plan. (Photo: Shutterstock)

Employers far and wide struggle with a very important decision; when offering a health benefit plan to its employees, should the plan engage in subrogation and reimbursement activities? Why would a plan/employer want to do, or not do, such a thing? Don’t subrogation and reimbursement negatively impact the very plan participants the plan is designed to benefit? Perhaps of even more concern, will employees of the company view this as the employer taking money from the employees? Or is there some bigger force at play that would encourage, perhaps even require, that a benefit plan engage in subrogation and reimbursement?

Wait… what the heck is subrogation and reimbursement, anyway?

Complete your profile to continue reading and get FREE access to, part of your ALM digital membership.

Your access to unlimited content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:

  • Critical information including cutting edge post-reform success strategies, access to educational webcasts and videos, resources from industry leaders, and informative Newsletters.
  • Exclusive discounts on ALM, BenefitsPRO magazine and events.
  • Access to other award-winning ALM websites including and

Already have an account?



Join BenefitsPRO

Don’t miss crucial news and insights you need to navigate the shifting employee benefits industry. Join now!

  • Unlimited access to - your roadmap to thriving in a disrupted environment
  • Access to other award-winning ALM websites including and
  • Exclusive discounts on and ALM events.

Already have an account? Sign In Now
Join BenefitsPRO

Copyright © 2023 ALM Global, LLC. All Rights Reserved.