Participant longevity is increasing the risk faced by DB plans. (Photo: Shutterstock)

Limiting risk, compared with eliminating it altogether, is a consideration for employers seeking to manage the risks of defined benefit plans, and a new white paper from Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company.explores the pros and cons of a range of strategies.

The paper "Key decisions for de-risking your pension plan" looks at multiple strategies:

• freezing plans to new entrants
• hibernating plans
• reallocating investment assets
• shifting pension obligations to a life insurer as part of a pension risk transfer

That last is emerging as the choice of an increasing number of employers, according to Neil Drzewiecki, head of pension risk transfer for MassMutual.

In a statement, Drzewiecki says hat while there are both short- and long-term risk management strategies employers can consider, "More employers are concluding that transferring those risks to a life insurer is in the best interests of the company and its employees."

Participant longevity is increasing the risk faced by DB plans, since it requires payments for more years and greater funding of plans, and there has been a steady growth of pension buyouts as a method of managing risk.

MassMutual cites LIMRA Secure Retirement Institute figures that indicate the growth of PRT to $26.4 billion in 2018, from $3.84 billion in 2013.

The report says, "The increase in PRT activity tracks both increases in pension funding levels as well as rising premiums paid by employers to the Pension Benefit Guarantee Corp. (PBGC), the federal agency backstopping pensions of American workers. PBGC premiums for single-employer plans have more than doubled in the past 10 years, rising to $80 per participant in 2019."

The white paper examines four different strategies:

1. Hibernating risks—closing a DB plan to new participants—stops accruals, which protects against benefit increases, but it does not eliminate other risks, such as interest rate risk.
2. Establishing glide paths moves plan investment allocations toward fixed income as a plan's funded status improves, and provides a couple of other advantages: it helps diminish the risk-reward trade off associated with equities, and also provides a hedging effect against the rise or fall of interest rates via fixed-income assets.
3. Hedging risks can take the edge off volatility, although it won't eliminate all risk and can't hedge against every eventuality.
4. And last but not least, the purchase of annuities as part of a PRT transaction offloads longevity risk while replicating a DB plan's pension benefits. It also provides the services required to support annuitants.

READ MORE:

• Funded status of U.S. corporate pensions slipped in 2018: study
• Rich professionals using pension plans as a tax dodge
• Union pensions: Will Congress kick the can on a solution?