For much of the past two decades, the conventional wisdom has been less is more. Plan participants with limited investment knowledge can be overwhelmed by more options—a phenomenon known among behavioral economists as "choice overload."
That can trigger paralysis, and in the worst case, scare a worker away from deferring earnings to 401(k)s.
A body of academic research backed that theory. One study, published in 2004, showed that participation rates declined by 1.5 percent with every 10 investment funds added to a 401(k)s core menu.
That was then, this is now
But new research from Morningstar is pushing back on that conventional wisdom, and in fact shows that with investment menus, bigger is actually better for participation rates and investment outcomes.
Continue Reading for Free
Register and gain access to:
- Breaking benefits news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
- Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
- Critical converage of the property casualty insurance and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, PropertyCasualty360 and ThinkAdvisor
Already have an account? Sign In Now
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.