Stuck in the middle: Consumers harmed by contract disputes between providers, insurers
Contract disputes can cause financial and health risks for consumers when the disputes move providers into out-of-network status.
By Scott Wooldridge|March 18, 2020 at 10:07 AM
Thank you for sharing!
Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Consolidation on both the payer and provider side of health care is heightening the disruption caused by contract negotiations between the two parties, a new study from finds. And although the disputes are usually resolved at some point, consumers can suffer both financial and health risks when the disputes move providers into out-of-network status.
The report from the Center on Health Insurance Reforms from the Georgetown University Health Policy Institute said that a decade of consolidation in the health care industry have led many areas to have more than 50 percent consolidation of providers or insurers, which have raised the stakes in provider-payer contract negotiations.
Complete your profile to continue reading and get FREE access to BenefitsPRO.com, part of your ALM digital membership.
Your access to unlimited BenefitsPRO.com content isn’t changing. Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:
Critical BenefitsPRO.com information including cutting edge post-reform success strategies, access to educational webcasts and videos, resources from industry leaders, and informative Newsletters.
Exclusive discounts on ALM, BenefitsPRO magazine and BenefitsPRO.com events.
Access to other award-winning ALM websites including ThinkAdvisor.com and Law.com
Competing successfully in today’s labor market means moving away from reactive recruitment practices that are overly reliant on compensation. Instead, take a more strategic approach with innovative add-on health benefits that complement core benefits and can be tailored to the needs and wants of a diverse workforce. Download this guide to learn how.