Insurers seeking reimbursement under ACA denied hearing by Supreme Court

The decision deals a blow to insurers looking to recoup payments they believe they are owed by the federal government.

By Alan Goforth | June 23, 2021 at 09:41 AM

Supreme Court building The Supreme Court had previously ruled in April 2020 that the federal government had to fully repay insurers for risk-corridor payments under the ACA.

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday declined to hear arguments from three insurance companies seeking reimbursement under the Affordable Care Act. As a result, lower courts will decide the issue.

Maine Community Health Options, Community Health Choice and Common Ground Healthcare Cooperative had sought help from the high court to receive the reimbursements, some of which go back years. The insurers said they collectively were owed millions of dollars for each year they did not receive payments the government had pledged to make under the ACA. The court did not give a reason for not taking up the case, but the decision deals a blow to insurers looking to recoup payments they believe they are owed by the federal government.

Recommended For You

The Supreme Court had previously ruled in April 2020 that the federal government had to fully repay insurers for risk-corridor payments under the ACA. The court ruled insurers were entitled to more than $12 billion in unpaid payments. The risk corridor program ran from 2014 to 2016. It guaranteed payments to ACA exchange insurers that recorded certain losses. The goal was to help insurers navigate the new exchanges that went online in 2014.

However, the needed payments increased as the initial population on the ACA's exchanges was sicker than usual and plans were priced too low. A few months later, in August, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit decided that the Supreme Court ruling meant payments were mandatory, too.

The court ruled that plans that engaged in the practice of "silver loading" were not entitled to full payments. Plans employed silver loading, where they added the amount of cost-sharing reductions to the second-cheapest silver plan, which also is the benchmark plan that the to which the federal government pegs subsidies. The result of silver loading was that subsidies went up, because the benchmark plan's cost increased.

This was the second ACA-related ruling in the past week. The high court in a 7-2 decision last Thursday rejected a Republican challenge to the law, the third time that the justices preserved the ACA over the past decade.

NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

Alan Goforth

Alan Goforth is a freelance writer in suburban Kansas City. In addition to freelancing for several publications, he has written a dozen books about sports and other topics.

By Allison Bell | May 06, 2025

A new in vitro fertilization benefit would make coverage for up to three attempts to create embryos through an IVF process an essential health benefit.

California may expand standard small-group coverage to include IVF, hearing aids

By Allison Bell | May 06, 2025

A team found HDHP enrollees with chronic conditions were 22% less likely than other employer plan enrollees to get the right drugs.

High-deductible health plans slash use of recommended care, JAMA study finds

By Alan Goforth | May 05, 2025

“Across a range of questions, large majorities of Democrats and independents oppose the Trump administration’s major cuts to federal health agencies and programs, while Republicans are more supportive,” the survey report said.

ACA subsidies, agency staffing cuts draw strong opposition, study finds
Identifying Benefits Blind Spots: 3 Steps to Building a Well-Rounded Benefits Playbook link

Guide

Sponsored by New Benefits

Clients expect strategic advice, not just sales. This guide reveals 3 steps to audit benefits, fill gaps, and present holistic strategies that meet client goals and employee needs--positioning employee benefits brokers as trusted advisors.

Benefit Strategy Savers: A Broker's Guide to Solving 2025 Benefit Challenges link

Guide

Sponsored by ArmadaCare

Discover how employer-paid supplemental health benefits can help close coverage gaps, reduce out-of-pocket costs, and boost retention!

Trends 2025: What to Watch in the Retirement Industry link

White Paper

Sponsored by TIAA

2025 is expected to bring increased market volatility, policy shifts, and new cybersecurity threats that could impact employee retirement savings. This white paper provides HR professionals with the insights they need to strengthen retirement benefits, support employee financial wellness, and navigate the evolving landscape with confidence.