Class-action lawsuit alleges that Aetna violated parity requirements for mental health services
The complaint alleges that Aetna imposes a set of overly restrictive criteria to determine which residential treatment facilities are covered.
By Alan Goforth|October 06, 2021 at 11:14 AM
Thank you for sharing!
Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
The demand for behavioral health services is soaring during the pandemic, and consumers are beginning to challenge decisions by insurance providers. A class-action lawsuit filed this week in U.S. District Court in the Central District of California alleges that Aetna illegally denied claims for mental health residential treatment services.
In 2019, the plaintiff, who has an Aetna insurance plan through his employer, enrolled his 16-year-old son with autism spectrum disorder in a mental health residential treatment center in Utah. Aetna denied the plaintiff’s claim for reimbursement for his son’s treatment at the residential facility.
Complete your profile to continue reading and get FREE access to BenefitsPRO.com, part of your ALM digital membership.
Your access to unlimited BenefitsPRO.com content isn’t changing. Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:
Critical BenefitsPRO.com information including cutting edge post-reform success strategies, access to educational webcasts and videos, resources from industry leaders, and informative Newsletters.
Exclusive discounts on ALM, BenefitsPRO magazine and BenefitsPRO.com events.
Access to other award-winning ALM websites including ThinkAdvisor.com and Law.com