The ERISA Industry Committee supports new regulations proposed by the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation that would tinker with premium payments, premium rates and reduce regulatory burdens, but is against a provision that would apply loading factors to premiums of at-risk plans.

In a letter to the PBGC, ERIC said it appreciated the efforts of the PBGC and its response to the concerns of plan sponsors. It supports the proposal to change the premium due date for large plans and the proposal to lower the self-correction penalty cap. It does believe that the PBGC should not apply loading factors to premiums for plans that are at-risk.

ERIC said in its letter that the Employee Retirement Income Security Act contains separate provisions relating to the funding of pension plans and PBGC's premiums.  ERISA 303(d) provides funding rules for plans that are not at-risk; section 303(i)(1) requires a plan that has been in at-risk status in two of the past four plan years to add a loading factor when calculating its funding target; and ERISA 4006 calculates the PBGC annual premium rate for single-employer plans based on an amount for each participant in the plan plus an additional premium that is equal to a dollar amount for each $1,000 of unfunded vested benefits divided by the number of participants.

Continue Reading for Free

Register and gain access to:

  • Breaking benefits news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
  • Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
  • Critical converage of the property casualty insurance and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, PropertyCasualty360 and ThinkAdvisor
NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.